About prostate cancer misdiagnosis claims
On this page(8)
A missed prostate cancer diagnosis may deserve a malpractice review if harm followed an abnormal result without follow-up, a misread biopsy, or another error in diagnosing the cancer. A later diagnosis doesn't, by itself, mean the doctor was negligent. Start by gathering your PSA reports with the doctor's follow-up notes. A lawyer in your state can then review those records to see whether the care and harm support a claim.
You don't need answers to every medical question before asking for help. Keep what you think happened separate from what the records actually show as you read them. This page gives general information, not advice about your care or claim.
What prostate cancer misdiagnosis means
Prostate cancer misdiagnosis means the cancer in the prostate wasn't identified correctly. You might be worried that someone missed the diagnosis or misread your biopsy. Or you may have an abnormal PSA result that wasn't evaluated further for some time. The review needs to identify which decision you're questioning or what someone didn't do, since these aren't the same problem.
A benign diagnosis doesn't necessarily mean the diagnosis was right. Cathey & Strain's discussion of prostate cancer misdiagnosis describes cancer being mistaken for benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH. That error can happen, but it doesn't tell you whether your own BPH diagnosis was wrong.
Ask your treating doctor which findings support the diagnosis you have now. Your doctor can explain which report they're relying on now and whether someone reviewed the earlier biopsy interpretation if that reading is disputed. Keep the original report with any corrected version you save.
Where a diagnostic delay may begin
Start the review with a particular entry in your medical chart. Check the wording of the abnormal PSA result that concerns you, along with the record of what happened afterward. Start with the pathology report for a disputed biopsy, and look at the message that explained the result to the patient.
The doctor you saw last isn't necessarily the one who made an error. Ask who received the result and what they planned to do afterward. Were you told about that plan? Keep each office's records separate while you put the dates in order, if your care involved several offices.
- Unaddressed PSA result: What did the doctor recommend after acknowledging the abnormal result?
- Disputed biopsy: What differs between the original and later reports? Ask your doctor about any disagreement.
- Benign diagnosis: Ask what supported the earlier diagnosis and what prompted the later cancer evaluation.
- Follow-up gap: Did anyone recommend a referral or an appointment? Save any messages that show what happened afterward.
These questions give someone a way to review your care, not proof of negligence. The broader misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis page may help you identify what concerns you if you can't yet pinpoint where the diagnosis went wrong.
Warning signs don't tell the whole story
Symptoms alone won't tell you whether a doctor should have diagnosed the cancer earlier. A patient in one r/ProstateCancer discussion reported having no signs or symptoms before a slightly elevated PSA result and family history prompted a biopsy.
“Zero sign or symptom. A slightly elevated PSA test and a family history of prostate cancer lead to a biopsy which found it.”
That's one person's account. You can't use it as a screening guideline to decide when you should have been tested or what a particular PSA result called for. To understand the result in light of your own medical history, ask your clinician to explain it.
The Cambridge Independent reported concerns about missed early prostate cancer cases in its coverage of national guidance and health messaging. That reporting concerns a different setting for healthcare. You can't use that report to determine what a United States doctor needed to do to meet the standard of care.
When a bad outcome may be malpractice
A cancer diagnosis can leave you feeling devastated. It doesn't prove negligence, though; a malpractice reviewer needs to look at the care you received and the harm said to have followed. A lawyer in your state can explain how those requirements apply to the care and harm you're asking about.
The standard of care
What care should the clinician have provided when making the disputed decision? That's what reviewers ask. Ask what a medical reviewer would need to evaluate the PSA follow-up or biopsy reading. The later cancer diagnosis doesn't replace a review of what the clinician knew when they made that decision.
Causation
The reviewer then needs to ask whether the alleged error actually caused harm. Even if no one has explained a gap in the chart, that gap alone doesn't answer the question. Ask anyone who says earlier action would have changed your care to explain the medical support for what they're saying.
The harm being claimed
Describe exactly what has changed. Don't assume the delay caused everything you've experienced from cancer when you explain your treatment and its effects to the lawyer reviewing your care. To separate the underlying illness from the injury you want the firm to investigate, bring records that help show the difference.
- Duration described in the title of a Cambridge Medical Experts failure-to-diagnose case discussion, not a filing deadline
- 11 years
- Source
In the suit described in Cambridge Medical Experts' case discussion, the allegation was that no one followed up on an original abnormal PSA reading. Allegations prove nothing. Even though the article's title gives a duration, it doesn't tell you how much time you have to file your own claim.
What to gather before a case review
Keep your first request small. Instead of piecing everything together from memory, ask for records surrounding the result or diagnosis that concerns you. If those records leave questions unanswered, write them in a separate note.
Find the original result
When you request the PSA or biopsy report that concerns you, include the date and ordering clinician's name if you know them. Save the actual document. Even if you remember a phone call, it can't replace the report.
Collect the follow-up record
When you get visit notes and relevant patient-portal messages, look for what they recommended doing next. A referral or follow-up instruction might not be there. If it's missing, write down a question about it, don't treat the absent document as proof.
Add the later diagnosis
Along with the report confirming cancer, collect the treatment discussions that followed it. If the earlier diagnosis conflicts with that report, ask your current doctor to explain why in words you understand.
Write a dated account
As you write down when you learned each result, note what you were told to do. Keep estimates labeled apart from exact dates. So the lawyer has the full account, include any appointments you missed and decisions you made.
Ask about review and timing
Before you've gathered every record, tell the lawyer where you received care and ask when you must file. Before the firm can evaluate a possible claim, which medical questions need answers? Ask about those, too.
If you think a specimen or report got mixed up, that category is covered on the laboratory errors page. For questions about how a hospital handled results, see the page on hospital and nursing negligence. Even with these labels, you haven't established whether anyone is legally responsible, or who.
Deadlines differ by state
If you're considering a prostate cancer misdiagnosis claim, there's no single nationwide statute of limitations. Deadlines vary by state. Although the state pages can help you find information for the place where you received care, you'll need to ask a lawyer there to explain your filing deadline.
When you read about another person's case, don't use that article to calculate your filing deadline. Along with when the disputed care happened, tell the lawyer when you learned of the possible error. Before that deadline expires, what must happen? Ask directly which deadline applies.
Your next conversation
You don't have to accuse anyone of wrongdoing to request a review. One way to begin is: “I'm concerned that this abnormal result wasn't followed up. Can you review the records and explain whether the delay caused additional harm?”
When you have medical questions, take them to your care team. To review the care you're questioning, which records would the firm need, and how would it assess them? Ask the lawyer. Before requesting records for a partner or parent you're helping, find out what permission you'll need.
1.Something went wrong
Write down dates and names while they're fresh.
2.Get your records
Ask for your full chart and test results.
3.Free case review
A lawyer looks at what happened, free.
4.Medical opinion
A doctor checks whether the care fell short.
5.File before the deadline
Your lawyer starts the claim before the deadline.
6.Settlement or trial
Many claims settle. Some go to a judge or jury.
Common questions
What happens when you are diagnosed with prostate cancer?
What exercises should I avoid if I have prostate problems?
What should I eat after prostate cancer treatment?
How can I support my partner with prostate cancer?
What is the divorce rate among prostate cancer patients?
What is the 2 week rule for prostate cancer?
Sources
- Prostate cancer can be misdiagnosed as a benign condition, Cathey & Strain
- An unexpected verdict in an 11 year failure to diagnose case, Cambridge Medical Experts
- Prostate cancer cases detected too late due to misleading guidance, Cambridge Independent
- Patient discussion of early signs of prostate cancer, Reddit, r/ProstateCancer