On this page(13)
The process at a glance
1Find candidates
Maps, search results, bar and law society directories
2Verify
Malpractice work, local office, license and discipline
3Collect evidence
Reviews, published results, community discussion
4Score
Six factors, 100 points
5Write
Drafted from the verified sources
6Quality checks
A list that fails is held, not published
7Publish
Dated, versioned, sourced
8Re-verify
Every quarter
Re-verify returns to Verify, each quarter.
1. Finding candidates
A list starts with a wide net. For each city, and for each type of case on a practice area list, we gather law firms from:
- Google Maps results for medical malpractice lawyers in and around the city
- Google search results for the city and the type of case
- State bar and provincial law society directories
- Firms that ask to be considered through our consideration form
Being found isn't the same as being listed. Most candidates don't make a list, usually because their own website doesn't show enough medical malpractice work.
2. Verifying each firm
Medical malpractice work
The firm's own website shows that it handles medical malpractice cases. For a practice area list, such as birth injury or wrongful death, the site has to show that work too. A general personal injury firm that mentions malpractice once doesn't pass.
A local presence
The firm has an office in the city or its metro area, or says clearly that it represents clients there.
License and discipline
Where the state bar or provincial law society publishes a searchable directory, we check that the firm's lawyers hold an active license and look for public discipline. Where the directory doesn't let us confirm this, we mark the firm Unverified on that point instead of assuming it's fine.
3. Collecting evidence
For every verified firm we collect evidence you can check yourself, and we link all of it.
- Client reviews: the Google rating, the number of reviews, the themes that come up again and again, and short quotes attributed to the reviewer and linked to the review.
- Results: verdicts and settlements the firm publishes. We link to the source and label them as reported by the firm. We do not treat a result as confirmed unless a court record or a news report backs it up.
- Community discussion: what people say about the firm on Reddit, including local subreddits, linked to the thread. These are individual experiences, not verified facts, and we present them that way.
- Practical details: the lawyers who handle malpractice, their years in practice, languages spoken, and whether the firm offers a free consultation and works on contingency.
4. Scoring
Each verified firm is scored out of 100 on six factors. The weights are the same on every list, and each firm shows its total and the points it earned on each factor. The scored firms on a list appear in score order.
| Factor | Weight | What we look at | Where the evidence comes from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus on malpractice | 25 | How much of the firm's work is medical malpractice, and for a niche list, that niche: dedicated pages, case types, lawyers assigned | The firm's own website |
| Results | 20 | Malpractice verdicts and settlements the firm publishes, how recent and how relevant they are | Firm results pages, court records or news reports, linked |
| Client reviews | 20 | Average rating, number of reviews and recurring themes; volume matters as much as the average | Google reviews, with short attributed quotes |
| Experience | 15 | Years handling malpractice cases and the years in practice of the lawyers who handle them | Firm biographies, bar and law society records |
| Standing | 10 | License status and any public discipline record | State bar and provincial law society directories, where public |
| Recognition | 10 | Peer recognition and board certification from bodies the bar recognizes; awards a firm can simply buy count for nothing | The awarding body's own listing, linked |
| Total | 100 |
What never counts toward a score
- Whether a firm pays us for a featured spot
- Whether a firm contacted us or asked to be considered
- Advertising spend, website design or search ranking
- Awards that a firm can buy or nominate itself for
Our lists do not describe lawyers as specialists or experts, because many bars restrict those words. A score is our assessment of the evidence we could verify. It is not a guarantee of any result.
5. Writing and quality checks
Each list is written from the verified evidence. Before it can go up, it has to pass automated checks:
- At least five verified firms
- Every factual claim tied to a source
- No words that bar advertising rules restrict, such as specialist or expert
- Not too similar to the lists for nearby cities
- The Featured label and its one-line disclosure on every list with a featured partner
- A check for writing that reads as formulaic or machine-made
- Length within range, and every link working
A list that fails any check is held until the problem is fixed. If a city doesn't have five firms that pass, we cover it in a list for the wider metro area or region instead.
Keeping lists current
We re-verify every list each quarter: license status, offices, reviews, published results and links. Each list shows when it was last updated and last verified. A firm that no longer passes is removed at the next update, or sooner if we learn of a problem.
The Featured spot
A featured partner pays to appear first on lists in its market, labeled Featured, and every other position comes from our scoring.
On those lists the partner is item 1, with a one-line disclosure under its card, and the scored firms start at number 2. If the partner's firm also earned a scored spot, we show it once, in the featured spot. Our featured partner in Canada is Diamond & Diamond. Every way we make money is on our disclosures page, and law firms can read about featured placement.
How we use AI
AI tools help us research candidate firms, pull facts out of the sources we collect and draft each list from those sources. AI never adds a fact that isn't in our sources, and every list still has to pass the checks above. Our AI policy has the details.
How a firm can ask to be considered
It's free. Any firm can ask us to look at it by sending the details we need to verify it. The methodology decides the outcome, so a request does not guarantee a place, and firms don't approve or edit what we write.
Corrections
If something on a list is wrong, tell us at [email protected]. We check every report against the sources, fix what's wrong and note material corrections on the page. See our corrections policy.
Conflicts of interest
Featured partners and sponsors have no say in how firms are scored or in what we write, and they don't see lists before they're published. We don't take a fee for any case or referral. Anyone who writes or reviews for us has to tell us about any relationship with a firm they cover, and that person doesn't work on that firm's lists.
Methodology versions
2026.11
First published version: six factors (focus 25, results 20, client reviews 20, experience 15, standing 10, recognition 10), a minimum of five verified firms per list and quarterly re-verification.
When the method changes, we publish the new version here and move every list to it at its next refresh. Each list shows the version it was scored under.

