Of the 97 firms that show misdiagnosis work on our 28 city lists in the United States, Hastings Law Firm scores highest on malpractice focus, published results, client reviews and experience, followed by The Law Offices of Dr. Michael M. Wilson MD, JD & Associates and Wapner Newman Attorneys At Law. Each firm keeps its best score from the cities it serves; open a city for its full list.
Best Misdiagnosis Lawyers in the United States
Feature your firm first on this page
This spot goes to one firm for a year. It's shown first, above everyone below, and labeled Featured.
4.6102 Google reviewsRated 4.6 out of 5 on Google from 102 reviews
Best for: Misdiagnosis and surgical injury claims
Among Hastings Law Firm's published results are a $19,750,000 failure-to-diagnose settlement and a $10,700,000 negligent-prescribing jury verdict. Because it focuses on malpractice and publishes those results, it tops this list.
We order firms by how much of their work is medical malpractice, the results they publish, what their clients say, their experience, their standing with the regulator and the recognition they have earned, all from public records and the firms' own sites. How lists are made
5.0216 Google reviewsRated 5.0 out of 5 on Google from 216 reviews
Best for: Delayed diagnosis and anesthesia injuries
An alleged delayed diagnosis of HSV encephalitis is behind the $11.65 million result published by The Law Offices of Dr. Michael M. Wilson MD, JD & Associates. For negligent anesthesia care, it reports another result of $8 million.
We order firms by how much of their work is medical malpractice, the results they publish, what their clients say, their experience, their standing with the regulator and the recognition they have earned, all from public records and the firms' own sites. How lists are made
4.7226 Google reviewsRated 4.7 out of 5 on Google from 226 reviews
Best for: Birth injury and delayed diagnosis
Among Wapner Newman Attorneys At Law's listed results are $8.4 million for brain injury after a delayed diagnosis and $7 million for birth trauma causing brain damage.
We order firms by how much of their work is medical malpractice, the results they publish, what their clients say, their experience, their standing with the regulator and the recognition they have earned, all from public records and the firms' own sites. How lists are made
We order firms by how much of their work is medical malpractice, the results they publish, what their clients say, their experience, their standing with the regulator and the recognition they have earned, all from public records and the firms' own sites. How lists are made
We order firms by how much of their work is medical malpractice, the results they publish, what their clients say, their experience, their standing with the regulator and the recognition they have earned, all from public records and the firms' own sites. How lists are made
Misdiagnosis lawyers by state
The rules change from one state to the next, so the lawyers near you are the ones to call.
Google reviews of the firms on our lists, quoted as their clients wrote them and linked to where they were posted. We don't write, edit or pick reviews for pay.
L
Lizzy
November 2026 · Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
“My names MaryElizabeth I was helped by Greg and his assistants. I'd have to say they went above and beyond to help me get the best settlement!! After 6 months we settled at the highest amount possible!! I am so thankful and grateful for them and will definitely refer any friend or family to them!! Thank you guys again!”
“The Baer team, especially Melinda, was instrumental in helping me through the aftermath of a car accident.
Melinda was friendly, transparent, and always took the time to answer my questions. She made the entire process much less stressful and gave me confidence every step of the way.
I highly recommend the Baer team!”
“Sean McConnell was very professional and always kept in touch with me concerning the progress of my case. He was knowledgeable and empathetic, and I trusted him throughout the entire process. He prepared me well and set my expectations appropriately. I would highly recommend this law firm and especially Sean McConnell!”
A patient harmed by a wrong or delayed diagnosis may have reason to request a medical malpractice review. First, identify what the clinician missed. Ask a lawyer in your state whether the facts could support a claim after you've considered how the error affected you.
Start with what happened. From the first diagnosis to the date it changed, write down what happened along the way. You can ask a lawyer to look at your concerns even if some medical questions are still unanswered.
What misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis mean
When a clinician gives the wrong diagnosis, that's misdiagnosis. When the correct diagnosis comes late, that's delayed diagnosis. If a condition goes unidentified, that's failure to diagnose; the condition might be cancer, stroke, heart attack or infection.
That gives your concern a name. What matters more for the review is what the charts say: identify the first diagnosis and the one recorded later. If you're unsure whether the clinician named the wrong condition or missed it altogether, say so; you don't have to settle that question.
Rather than saying something went wrong, describe what happened at the actual encounters. Write down what you told the clinician at each visit, then check whether the chart matches your memory. Mark anything that seems missing or inaccurate.
Use these questions to work through the care you're questioning. Asking about a possible error doesn't mean you've established that someone was negligent.
Does the visit note include the symptoms or concerns you reported? Write down any differences you find, along with the date.
Does the chart explain the clinician's decision to order or skip any of the tests you discussed?
If you had a test, what does its report say? Who reviewed the result, and what happened after that review?
What did they tell you about following up? Write down any later calls or messages about symptoms that still hadn't gone away.
At what point did another clinician identify the condition? What information, if any, did they have that the earlier clinician didn't have at the time?
Warning signs: separate your health concerns from the legal review
Ask your treating clinician which symptoms need attention now and what changes mean you should seek care, rather than guessing. You can't get medical instructions from a malpractice review. Your clinician's concerns about a particular condition determine which warning signs matter for your health.
When you talk with the lawyer, mention concerns you reported repeatedly and results you didn't understand. If the response didn't match the follow-up you were promised, point out what was different to the lawyer. Rather than deciding what happened proves, describe it and include the message itself, so you're not just saying nobody listened.
What makes it malpractice rather than a bad outcome?
What standard of care applied, and how might the alleged error have hurt you? Ask the lawyer to explain. A disappointing outcome doesn't tell you either of those things. A changed diagnosis doesn't answer them either; ask for a review of the care itself, not just how serious the eventual diagnosis was.
The standard of care
Given what was known at that visit, what should a clinician have done? Tell the lawyer which decision you're questioning, whether it's the assessment at the visit or what happened after a result came back. Would evaluating that decision require an expert witness, given the rules in your state?
Causation
The next question is how the diagnostic error you identified relates to the injury. How would an earlier or correct diagnosis have changed what happened to you? Ask the lawyer how to check that connection, including what they still can't determine from the evidence. Just because one event happened after another, that doesn't prove the first caused the second.
Harm
How do you think the error affected you afterward? Bring records that back up what you've described, including bills or missed-work documentation if you're concerned about those losses. Which effects might you legally recover for, and which might come from the underlying condition?
Prepare for a case review
A practical way to organize your concerns
1
Write a short timeline
Begin where you believe the clinician missed the diagnosis: that encounter. When you add the later diagnosis, explain what happened in between. If you have exact dates, give them; mark any date you're uncertain about as approximate.
2
Gather the records you already have
Gather the discharge instructions that relate to your concern, as well as visit notes and test reports. Tell the lawyer which records you still don't have. Before the lawyer can review the care, what else do you need to get?
3
Describe the harm in your own words
Describe the changes after the alleged error, making clear when you're repeating a clinician's words rather than giving your own account. Mark any parts a family member remembers if they help you write, so those aren't mistaken for your own memories.
4
Ask about the deadline first
Along with where you received care, tell the lawyer when you first found out something might have gone wrong. Which filing deadline applies to you, and do you need to ask about other timing rules?
5
Ask what the review can establish
Before the lawyer can decide whether to take the case, what else do you need to provide? Before agreeing to representation, talk with the lawyer about medical review and what you'd pay in fees (including possible expenses).
Leave the messages and reports as they are. Write your comments in a separate note so the lawyer can tell which words are yours and which came from the record. For your first conversation, a brief, readable account is enough, with a note about other documents rather than an explanation of every page.
Deadlines differ by state
Don't rely on a deadline from another state. A lawyer in the relevant state can explain how the statute of limitations applies to your dates and circumstances; ask because each state's rules differ. The state pages are a place to start looking for information about where you received care.
When do you have to file? Your lawyer should answer. The lawyer needs to know when you received the care you're questioning and when you first found out the diagnosis might have been wrong. If you received care in more than one state, say so when you first talk with the lawyer.
Choosing a lawyer for a diagnostic-error review
A listing that says “misdiagnosis lawyer” isn't enough. Does the firm take cases about the kind of error you've described, and will it consider care received in that state?
Some firms, including Bostwick & Associates and Janet, Janet & Suggs, use their search listings to advertise free consultations about misdiagnosis. The offer is a conversation. You still don't know whether the firm would take your case, and the offer says nothing about what representation would cost.
Examples of advertised misdiagnosis consultation contacts
Firm
Listed phone number
Advertised offer
source_url
Bostwick & Associates
(213) 519-5636
Free consultation for questions about a misdiagnosis lawsuit
When the firm says “free consultation”, will it review your records or just talk with you initially? Before you rely on that advertisement, find out what the firm actually offers. How much would you pay the firm in fees and expenses? An advertised consultation doesn't mean you can count on recovering any money.
What to do next
Your treating clinician is the person to ask if you have medical questions right now. To prepare for a legal review, write a short account of what you think went wrong and how it hurt you. Contact a lawyer in the relevant state about timing rather than putting it off for weeks while you try to get every document together.
The hospital and nursing negligence page can help you organize the hospital part of your account if you're questioning care you received there too. Related pages can help you figure out what to ask, but they can't settle who's responsible before someone reviews the care.
Looking at the record for the encounter you're questioning, how does that diagnosis differ from the later one? What evidence would show care below the standard of care that caused your injury, and can the lawyer explain what's needed? Bring the visit notes and relevant reports, because the change in diagnosis alone doesn't tell you whether the care caused your injury. Does your situation need more medical review, and if so, what kind?
How much compensation can you get for a wrong diagnosis?
This page doesn't estimate what compensation you might receive. After reviewing how you think the diagnostic error hurt you, can the lawyer explain which damages you could seek under the rules in your state? Bring documents showing the amounts of any losses you're claiming. Even if a firm offers a free consultation, you don't yet know what your claim is worth or whether you'll receive any payment.
Is it worth suing for medical malpractice?
Before deciding, get someone to look at your case. What can't the lawyer yet determine about the alleged error, or about the evidence linking it to the harm you suffered? Talk about what you'd pay in fees and expenses. You need to look at what happened in your own case before deciding whether a claim makes sense, even if the diagnosis is serious or the experience was upsetting.
What are examples of diagnostic errors that may raise negligence concerns?
If a wrong or delayed diagnosis hurts a patient, the care may need review, including when the clinician doesn't identify the condition at all. Cancer, stroke, heart attack or infection could be the diagnosis involved in these concerns. Those descriptions don't tell you whether anyone was negligent. Ask a lawyer to look at what happened during the encounter and explain which standard of care applies.
What are the odds of winning a medical malpractice lawsuit?
There's no win-rate figure on this page because a general percentage doesn't tell you how your particular claim would fare. Where does the lawyer reviewing your records see a strong case or a weak one? Did the care fall below the applicable standard and cause the harm you're alleging, according to the lawyer's review? Rather than asking for a promise about the result, ask the lawyer to review your claim and tell you what remains uncertain.
1
